Rates change, and people write things wrong. Our stance is simple: if it's wrong, we fix it — and we say publicly what changed and why, rather than quietly swapping it out and pretending nothing happened. This page explains how we handle errors, and logs the corrections we've already made, one by one.

Our corrections policy

How to report an error

If you spot something wrong, email [email protected], and please be as specific as you can:

That lets us check it fastest. Thanks to every reader who helps us catch mistakes.

Correction log

Below are the substantive corrections this site has made, in reverse chronological order.

Correction #1 · 2026-06-28
Where: the spot-rate section of the complete Binance fee guide.
Before: the first draft wrote the spot taker rate as a single fixed number (a hard-coded precise value), giving the impression that "this is the permanent rate."
Changed to: a range expression on the order of "around 0.1%," with the note added that it follows "whatever Binance's official fee page currently shows, verified June 2026."
Why: Binance adjusts rates with policy and VIP structure, and treating one moment's precise figure as fixed can mislead readers after the rate changes.
Correction #2 · 2026-06-28
Where: the futures-fee section of the complete Binance fee guide.
Before: the first draft explained futures fees without stating the charging base, which could lead readers to assume they're charged "on margin" or "on the same basis as spot."
Changed to: added the key clarification — futures fees are charged on the notional value of the position; with leverage the notional is amplified, and the fee is charged on the amplified figure — plus a note that this is the thing new traders most often miss.
Why: the charging base directly affects how readers estimate futures cost, and leaving it out makes people badly underestimate the real fee.
Correction #3 · 2026-06-28
Where: the withdrawal-cost section of the complete Binance fee guide.
Before: the first draft described the withdrawal fee as though it's "charged as a percentage of the withdrawal amount," which is easy to misread.
Changed to: corrected to say the withdrawal fee is mainly set by the blockchain network you choose and is largely unrelated to the amount; the same coin can differ severalfold across networks, with a reminder to confirm the receiving side supports the network before picking one.
Why: the way withdrawal fees are charged (by network, not by amount) is where an ordinary user can save the most and slip up the most, and the original description would have directly misled withdrawal choices.

Whenever there's a further substantive correction, we'll add it here. You can also learn our editorial principles on about us, and the "rates per official pages" stance in the disclaimer.